http://www.mystvale.com/bloodbowl/2008WinSprSession/RevisedSpellcaster-S8W.pdf

This looks pretty official and kinda explains what it is. Looks good to me. Ive printed a copy off so it'll be available in hard copy for our next meeting. Hope this is right!!!

Helen xx

Personally i don't like them, i don't think the Racial spells are not very even infact they are very uneven,

Also being able to cast more than one spell which potentially you can cast 3/4 spells which completely removes the tactical one spell per match element, My vote goes against.

I vote yes there are plenty of open spells to have.

I don't mind the open spells but some teams get royally screwed compared to others with the racial spells,

Mine especially is utterly, utterly pointless. I don't mind bringing in new rules but ones so heavily one sided as this shouldn't.

And allowing 3 spells a game we might as well just roll a D6 to see who wins the game.

Its supposed to be about playing the game not adding more and more things which are unbalanced.

I've changed my mind, i don't allow them being used but i think they should be limited to 1 spell, If we have multiple spells its just going to turn into who rolls best on the spells, you'd be feasibly be able to stop anyone from scoring

I'd also like to suggest that even for the spells where it says there is no negative for failure i think if the roll fails then the caster should be hit by the spell

but you can only increase to a higher level spellcaster if you roll a double for that players new skill roll and how likely is that going to be, and if they do, do that then they become easier to block/blitz.